Recent Post Headlines

Showing posts with label women at workplace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women at workplace. Show all posts

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2010

The Union Cabinet  approved the introduction of the Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2010 in the Parliament to ensure a safe environment for women at work places, both in public and private sectors whether organised or unorganized. The measure will help in achieving gender empowerment and equality.

The proposed Bill, if enacted, will ensure that women are protected against sexual harassment at all the work places, be it in public or private. This will contribute to realisation of their right to gender equality, life and liberty and equality in working conditions everywhere. The sense of security at the workplace will improve women's participation in work, resulting in their economic empowerment and inclusive growth.

Salient features of the Bill are as follows:

• The Bill proposes a definition of sexual harassment, which is as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997). Additionally it recognises the promise or threat to a woman's employment prospects or creation of hostile work environment as 'sexual harassment' at workplace and expressly seeks to prohibit such acts.

• The Bill provides protection not only to women who are employed but also to any woman who enters the workplace as a client, customer, apprentice, and daily wageworker or in ad-hoc capacity. Students, research scholars in colleges/university and patients in hospitals have also been covered. Further, the Bill seeks to cover workplaces in the unorganised sectors.

• The Bill provides for an effective complaints and redressal mechanism. Under the proposed Bill, every employer is required to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee. Since a large number of the establishments (41.2 million out of 41.83 million as per Economic Census, 2005) in our country have less than 10 workers for whom it may not be feasible to set up an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), the Bill provides for setting up of Local Complaints Committee (LCC) to be constituted by the designated District Officer at the district or sub-district levels, depending upon the need. This twin mechanism would ensure that women in any workplace, irrespective of its size or nature, have access to a redressal mechanism. The LCCs will enquire into the complaints of sexual harassment and recommend action to the employer or District Officer.

• Employers who fail to comply with the provisions of the proposed Bill will be punishable with a fine which may extend to ` 50,000.

• Since there is a possibility that during the pendency of the enquiry the woman may be subject to threat and aggression, she has been given the option to seek interim relief in the form of transfer either of her own or the respondent or seek leave from work.

• The Complaint Committees are required to complete the enquiry within 90 days and a period of 60 days has been given to the employer/District Officer for implementation of the recommendations of the Committee.

• The Bill provides for safeguards in case of false or malicious complaint of sexual harassment. However, mere inability to substantiate the complaint or provide adequate proof would not make the complainant liable for punishment.

Implementation of the Bill will be the responsibility of the Central Government in case of its own undertakings/establishments and of the State Governments in respect of every workplace established, owned, controlled or wholly or substantially financed by it as well as of private sector establishments falling within their territory. Besides, the State and Central Governments will oversee implementation as the proposed Bill casts a duty on the Employers to include a Report on the number of cases filed and disposed of in their Annual Report. Organizations, which do not prepare Annual Reports, would forward this information to the District Officer.

Through this implementation mechanism, every employer has the primary duty to implement the provisions of law within his/her establishment while the State and Central Governments have been made responsible for overseeing and ensuring overall implementation of the law. The Governments will also be responsible for maintaining data on the implementation of the Law. In this manner, the proposed Bill will create an elaborate system of reporting and checks and balances, which will result in effective implementation of the Law. 
 
Courtesy : PIB

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Kashmiri scientist named for CSIR award

Srinagar: A young scientist from central Kashmir district of Budgam has been nominated for CSIR Young Scientists award 2009.

Working with Indian Institute of Integrated Medicine Jammu, Dr. Fayaz Ahmad Malik of Soibugh Budgam is the first Kashmiri to get the award in the field of Biological cancer Research. There were 39 scientists from different states in the fray. The prime minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, will give the award to Dr. Malik at a function to be held in New Delhi on September 26. Dr. Malik received the communication to this effect from Prof. Samir-K-Brahmachari Director General CSIR.

Courtesy: Kashmir watch.com

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Representation of women members on Selection Committees/Boards Mandatory

Government has initiated steps to ensure better representation of women members on various Committees/ Boards concerned with the selection to posts in Central Government and also to monitor the trend in recruitment of women. Accordingly, DoPT has written to the secretaries of all Ministries/Departments of GoI, UPSC and SSC to instruct all appointing authorities to scrupulously observe the following guidelines:-

(i) The composition of selection Committees should be representative. It should be mandatory to have one woman member in the Selection Boards/ Committees for making recruitment to• ten (10) or more vacancies and lady candidates are expected to be available for the service / Post.

(ii) Where the number of vacancies against which selection is to be made is less than 10, no efforts should be spared in finding a lady officer for inclusion in such Committees / Boards.

(iii) In the event of such an officer not being available in the Ministry / Department itself, there is no objection to nominating lady officer from any other office at the same station.

(iv) Wide Publicity should be given to all appointments in Government, Advertisements should be issued in the language (s) spoken by large number of people of the State/UTs, apart from English and Hindi.

Earlier, the Govt had issued such guidelines for various Committees/Boards concerned with selection to Group C&D posts only.

Further, for Group'C' level Posts, having only basic qualifying requirements, information about vacancies for recruitment should also be disseminated through schools and colleges in that area, in addition to normal channels.

With a view to monitoring the trend in recruitment of women, all Ministries/ Departments are requested to submit a consolidated report including attached/ subordinate offices on the total number of posts and employees group- wise and gender wise as on 31.03.2009 latest by 31.08.2009. The consolidated annual position as on 31st March of every year may also be furnished thereafter by 30th May of that year.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Prithviraj Chavan announces standing committee for implementation of recommendations of task force for women in science

PIB
Government has constituted a Standing Committee to oversee the timely implementation of the recommendations of the task force for women in science. Announcing this at a press conference in New Delhi, Minister of Science and Technology and Earth Sciences, Shri Prithviraj Chavan said that the Committee under his chairmanship has 18 members. He said that the task force has submitted his report which is being studied and all feasible actions will be completed in a time bound manner. The Minister also said that a sub-committee will be constituted for development of women friendly policies and practical support systems inclusive of crèche, campus housing, transport, facilities for the elderly, mentoring, etc. Earlier, Shri Chavan interacted with several women scientists at the Women Scientists Meet 2009 organized by CSIR in coordination with DST and DBT. Some of the other outcome of the interactions are:

• Efficiency of existing gender sensitive scheme will be studied and actions taken to enhance their efficiency through revision of parameters and strengthening of implementation systems.

• A Nationwide survey of the reason for the pipeline leakage will be commissioned.

• Attempts will be made to make gender audit in scientific establishments obligatory: webpage information should carry statement of graduated goals and set up monitoring goals.

• Addressing the problems rather than achieving numerical goals will be the priority.

• Special schemes will be developed to avoid under employment of women.

Prof. S.K. Brahmachari, DG, CSIR, Dr. T. Ramasami, Secretary, DST and Dr. M.K. Bhan, Secretary, DBT were also present on the occasion.

PRA/SKK

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Sexual harassment at work: Govt to act

The sexual harassment at workplace bill 2008 is under the consideration of the government, the Lok Sabha was told on Friday.

Replying to a question, Minister for Women and Child Development Renuka Chowdhury said the draft 'The Protection of Women Against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill' has been submitted to the government for further action.

"The draft bill submitted by the National Women for Commission is under the consideration of the government," she said.

"As per the draft, a workplace has been defined as any department, organisation, undertaking and establishment or branch which is established, owned or controlled, financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the appropriate government or the local authority or a corporation or a cooperative society," the minister said.

She said besides this, any private sector organisation, institution, unit or service provider carrying on commercial, professional or industrial activities has been defined as a workplace.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Sexual Harassment at the Workplace:

Sexual Harassment at the Workplace: Implement the Guidelines

By A. Pandey, Womens Feature Service

In 1997, the Supreme Court (SC) took upon itself the task of framing the Vishaka Guidelines. The idea was to evolve an alternative mechanism to fulfill the urgent social need to protect working women from sexual harassment. These guidelines were declared as the law of the land and were binding and enforceable until suitable legislation was enacted. But although over a decade has passed since then, the legislation is yet to be put in place.

Statistics show that one woman is molested every 26 minutes and this refers to the reported cases only. If the unreported cases were to be included, it would be a matter of seconds rather than minutes. Most cases are not reported by victims because of reasons ranging from family and police pressures to the unreasonably long process of gaining justice.

The population of working women in India has grown multifold over the last decade. According to statistics, 60 per cent of women acknowledge that sexual harassment at the work place is rampant and has been accepted as a professional hazard by most women. Yet, the awareness and implementation of the Vishaka Guidelines remains poor. This was also recognised by the SC in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the case of Medha Kotwal (2006). The apex court went on to make State Governments, through the Labour Commissioners and Women and Child Departments, responsible for ensuring that all workplaces with 50 per cent and more women on their staff, set up a Complaints Committee (CC).

In reality, however, either the CCs don't exist as an ex-ante mechanism or are set up in an ad-hoc manner. The increasing number of complaints filed in the courts, in the National Commission for Women (NCW) and the State Women's Commissions (SWC), are a testimony to the lack of the proper implementation of the Vishaka Guidelines by the employer and the general ineffectiveness of the CCs.

A RTI application filed with the Labour Commissioner in Maharashtra in 2007 revealed that no concrete measures had been taken by it despite the SC order in the Medha Kotwal case. Another application filed under the Right to Information (RTI) with the Maharashtra State Women Commission revealed that 60 complaints of sexual harassment at the workplace were filed in four months between January 1, 2008 and April 30, 2008.

Most developed nations have recognised sexual harassment at the workplace as a serious abuse, resulting from the exertion of power on the victim by the perpetrator. Therefore sexual harassment, in addition to being a violation of the right to safe working conditions, is also a violation of a person's right to bodily integrity.

As the Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2007, is being deliberated and discussed, what is it that women have in terms of relief when employers fail to implement Vishaka Guidelines? This is a difficult question to answer. Yet, in the midst of all the chaos and confusion, the Courts have helped women secure justice, their rights and their dignity.

Take a few landmark judgements that have emerged recently: The Apparel Export Promotion Council v/s A.K. Chopra: AIR 1999 SC 625. This case is the first one where the SC applied the law as laid down under the Vishaka Guidelines. In this case, the SC recognised an important fact. It ruled that 'an attempt to molest' is equally an infringement of a woman's right to dignity at the workplace as a 'successful attempt of molestation'. The SC also recognised that in such cases, evidence and witnesses may not always be forthcoming. Hence, reliance has to be placed on the circumstantial evidence and whether it, in overall terms, inspires the confidence of the judges.

Then there is the Civil Writ Petition No. 8826 of 2004, which came up in the Bombay High Court in a case involving Tata Mettaliks Limited. Here, a lady supervisor was subject to sexual harassment at the hands of the Deputy GM at the plant. The lady sought an inquiry and the Management, with the help of an advocate, conducted an inquiry. The perpetrator was exonerated on the basis of this and the services of the woman concerned was terminated. She challenged her termination in a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, which decided in her favour and declared that the employer was guilty of unfair labour practices and granted reinstatement with consequential benefits. However, the Management failed to comply with the order of reinstatement by the order of the Labour Court. The matter was filed in the Bombay High Court which observed that Vishaka Guidelines are a law under Article 141
of the Constitution and that the powers to deal with the complaint of sexual harassment of an employee and inquiry vests with the CC and it cannot be decided by the Management.

The Delhi High Court order in a judgement involving S.K. Mallick, Director of National Academy of Audit and Account (NAAA), is another case in point: Mallick filed a petition before the Delhi High Court after the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) refused to stay the departmental proceedings of allegations of sexual harassment against him by a senior woman colleague. Mallick had allegedly entered the room of the woman officer at Shimla in an inebriated condition and misbehaved with her. The woman filed an FIR the next day and also intimated senior officials of Mallick's conduct. This led to a departmental inquiry. Mallick was suspended on the basis of a criminal case pending against him. He then approached the CAT seeking to stay the departmental inquiry. When the CAT refused to stay the departmental proceedings, Mallick approached the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi High Court while dismissing the petition made the following observations in respect of certain key definitions: (I) "Workplace" - The HC noted that in the case of the private sector, it is common for senior officials to run their businesses from their residences with the advancements in information technology. Accordingly, a person can interact or do business with other persons, while located in some other country by means of video conferencing, even while an officer or teacher may work from the accommodation allotted to her or him. Therefore, if an officer indulges in an act of sexual harassment with the employee, it would not be open for him to claim that the act had not been committed at the workplace but at his residence and get away with that argument. (II) "Any woman" - This expression is broad enough to include women of all ages, including women who may be senior in years and status. The HC said this in response to a plea by the accused
that that he could not be accused of sexually harassing a senior officer towards whom he was not in position to extend any sort of favour.

The above judgements set important precedents by extending the meaning of workplace, by defining who the affected women are, by delineating the nature of sexual harassment and the role of internal CCs. As the Draft Bill on Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment comes under national scrutiny, these judgements could help provide some much required clarity.

Courtesy :newsblaze.com