Recent Post Headlines

Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Banking, electronic payments and road ahead -Special address by Shri H. R. Khan, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India

Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen
1. I am glad to be in your midst today to share my thoughts on “Banking, electronic payments and the road ahead”. In fact the subject of my address very well fits the theme of the conference “Global banking: Paradigm shift” and its emphasis on productivity excellence. I am sure the experts whom you would have heard and interacted with over the last two days would have shared their thoughts on the changes and challenges that banking in India and globally is undergoing and has undergone over these last few momentous years, leading as it were to a paradigm shift in the way banks are doing their business and retaining and increasing their customer base. The basic underlying current that runs through this changing landscape is the ever increasing reliance on technology to cater to the needs of customers and process vast number of transactions including payment transactions.
2. In fact as you all are aware, payment and settlement systems form the backbone of any economy. They are the conduits or the arteries for conducting trade, commerce and other forms of economic activities including remittances in any country. An efficient payments system can be envisaged as the lubricant which speeds up the liquidity flow in the economy, thereby creating the necessary impetus and momentum for economic growth. The payments process is a vital aspect of financial intermediation; it enables the creation and transfer of liquidity among different economic agents. A smooth, well functioning and regulated payments system thus not only ensures efficient utilisation of scarce resources but also eliminates systemic risks. The payments and settlement system is, therefore, a crucial component of the financial infrastructure of any country and more so of a country like ours.
3. The spectacular growth in financial transactions in the country has necessitated certain radical changes in the payments and settlement system, whether it be in the area of wholesale payments or retail payments. While the changes in the wholesale payments are devoted to providing an efficient channel for transmission of monetary policy signals, and for the smooth functioning of various markets, the changes in the retail payments are aimed at providing efficient and timely payment mechanisms to the citizens of this country. The payment system also assumes importance in the context of domestic financial sector reforms and global financial integration that the country is undergoing currently. Foreign investments (direct and portfolio) are encouraged by the availability of an efficient payments system, as also the need for a low cost remittance facility for migrants to send money to their kith and kin within the country. Improved, faster and cheaper domestic money transfers through the payments system is also a part of the emerging scenario.
4. Given this scenario, let me through the remainder of this address devote myself to providing a bird’s eye-view of the current payment system landscape in the country; the other significant initiatives that have been undertaken; the game changers that would provide further fillip to this endeavour; identifying the potential goldmine as it were for deepening this process; the enablers to take this process forward; the challenges faced at the industry level; the role of the regulatory framework which could serve as a catalyst; and conclude with what I would call the 5 A’s of payment systems for providing an efficient, robust, safe, cost-effective payment services to our fellow citizens.
Section 1:  Payment System landscape in India
5. The stage of payment system development in a country to a large extent depends upon the adoption of technology, introduction of new payment instruments and the confidence of the public in using these payment instruments. In India cash still continues to be the predominant payment mode. This can be gauged from the fact that value of bank notes and coins in circulation as a percentage of narrow money is very high at 60.07% for the year 2009-20102, when compared to other emerging economies like South Africa (18.51%), China(18.83%), Mexico (39.14%). Brazil comes close to India with 52.70% of the value of banknotes and coins in circulation as a percentage of narrow money. This is perhaps a pointer that we have been relatively slow in embracing cashless payment modes and using them as cash substitute. The pre-dominant use of cash could also be attributed to the fact that the process for adoption of non-cash mode of payments started relatively late in the country.
6. Notwithstanding this, the Reserve Bank has been in the forefront both as operator and facilitator for promoting the use of cashless payment instruments in the country. The technology implementation in banks which have shaped the payment system in turn is largely driven by the recommendations of the various committees set up by RBI. Payment system modernisation started in late eighties with introduction of MICR based cheque clearing in mid eighties.
7. Paper based clearing: Paper based Clearing accounts for 59% of the total volume of transactions while it represents only 10% of the total value of transactions. RBI has taken a number of initiatives to promote efficiency in paper based clearing such as widespread use of MICR technology at 66 major centres in the country. Simultaneously, the introduction of speed clearing in 2008 has facilitated collection of outstation cheques on a local basis leveraging on core-banking infrastructure of banks. Speed clearing is currently available in 240 centres across the country.

8. Cheque Truncation System was operationalised in the National Capital Region, New Delhi in February 2008. Chennai has been identified as the next centre for roll out of a grid based CTS (to be operationalised by NPCI) which will cover the states of Tamilnadu, Kerala and Karnataka. All activities pertaining to roll out of CTS for Grid-based CTS at Chennai have been completed and the system is ready for roll-out by NPCI.
9. A new automation software package called ‘Express Cheque Clearing System’ (ECCS) has been developed. ECCS, being implemented jointly by SBI and NPCI, would replace the Magnetic Media Based Clearing Software employed in automation of Clearing Houses available at 1093 locations. It is expected to be rolled out across all these centres by September 2011 along with the speed clearing facility.

10. Electronic Payment Systems: Electronic Payment Systems accounts for 41% of the total volume of transactions while it represents 90% of the total value of transactions. Introduction of electronic payment products such as Electronic clearing service and electronic funds transfer, which over the years have metamorphosed into National ECS and National EFT and RTGS have ushered in new ways of payment processing.
11. National Electronic Fund Transfer (NEFT): NEFT was introduced in November 2005 now covers 77,821 branches and offers eleven hourly near real-time settlements on week days and five settlements on Saturdays. One of the unique features of the system is a mandatory ‘Positive Confirmation’ to the originator confirming successful credit to the beneficiary’s account. Since its inception, the system has witnessed a surge in the volume and value of transactions with 1.4 million transactions settling on a single day which is the highest volume processed till date.
12. Electronic Clearing Service (ECS) suite including NECS: The ECS suite of products enables bulk payments. The ECS suite consists of local ECS (jurisdiction limited to local clearing house branches), Regional ECS (state-wide jurisdiction in 9 centres) and National ECS (pan-India coverage). Both RECS and NECS facilitate STP-based processing of bulk payments in a centralised manner in all core-banking enabled bank branches within their jurisdiction. Average monthly volumes are 8.05 million transactions (ECS Credit -NECS, Regional and local) and 13.40 million transactions (ECS Debit– Regional and local), while monthly values are averaging about Rs.126.43 billion and Rs.60.60 billion for ECS Credit and ECS Debit respectively.
13. Real time Gross Settlement (RTGS): The RTGS system was introduced in March 2004 and now extends to 77,093 branches as at the end of June 2011. RTGS settles gross inter-bank and customer (Rs.2 lakh and above) transactions. On an average RTGS settles 1.8 lakh transactions with a value of Rs. 4 trillion on a daily basis. Considering the importance of RTGS for settling large value payment systems, action has been initiated for putting in place a Next-Gen RTGS.

Other retail Payment Channels:
14. Credit/Debit Cards: One of the fastest growing segments is the card segment with 18 million outstanding credit cards and 228 million debit cards. During the year 2010-11 (April-March) 265 million transactions for a value of Rs.755 billion was transacted using credit cards. 237 million transactions for a value of Rs.357 billion were transacted using debit cards at PoS terminals. Maximum usage of debit cards happens at ATMs with 4235 million transactions for a value of Rs.11,144 billion.

15. Pre-paid instruments: The pre-paid instrument issuers’ universe is populated by both banks and non-banks. In fact after the enactment of PSS Act, most of the non-bank entities who have received authorisation to operate a payment system are in this business segment. Policy Guidelines for issuance and operation of pre-paid payment instruments in India have been issued to provide for a framework for the orderly growth of this nascent market. Further measures have been recently announced by the Reserve Bank of India permitting banks to issue prepaid payment instruments to corporates for onward issuance to their employees after adhering to the norms prescribed.
16. Mobile Banking: The operating guidelines for mobile banking issued in October 2008 which were later relaxed in December 2009, facilitating mobile banking transactions up to Rs.50,000, both for e-commerce and money transfer purposes. Banks have also been permitted to provide money transfer facility up to Rs.5,000 from a bank account to beneficiaries not having bank accounts with cash payout facility at an ATM or Banking Correspondent. 50 banks have been permitted to offer  Mobile Banking transactions, of which 38 have started operations. The NEFT platform is used for settlement of all interbank mobile banking transactions.
17. Inter-bank mobile payment system: The IMPS on the other hand is a service operated by NPCI which provides an instant, 24X7, interbank electronic fund transfer service through mobile phones. Publicly launched on November 22, 2010 this system facilitates customers registered with their banks for this service to use mobile instruments as a channel for interbank fund transfers in a secured manner with immediate confirmation features. This service is in consonance with the Mobile Payment Guidelines 2008 issued by RBI which stress on interoperability both across banks and mobile operators in a safe and secured manner. Currently 27 member banks participate in this scheme. 18. National Financial Switch (NFS): The National Financial Switch as its name indicates is a national infrastructure with pan-Indian presence provides a switching service for connectivity across ATMs of banks. The NFS enables customers to perform their transactions (both financial and non-financial) using ATMs under the NFS network without reference to the card issuing banks. NFS which is the largest ATM switching network connects 80000+  ATMs with an average daily volume of transactions standing at 4.7 million (both financial and non-financial)3 and a value of Rs.2.5 billion. NFS is a service offered by NPCI.

Section-2: Other significant initiatives

19. NextGen RTGS: Steps have been initiated to replace the existing RTGS system with the Next Generation Real Time Gross Settlement (NG-RTGS) by adopting the latest technology and emerging business processes. Some of the new features proposed to be implemented in the NG-RTGS system are advanced liquidity management facility; extensible mark up language (XML) based messaging system conforming to ISO 20022; and real time information and transaction monitoring and control systems.
20. Core Banking Solution (CBS) in Reserve Bank of India: RBI is in the process of implementing a core banking solution. The CBS once implemented will bring significant benefits to all the key stakeholders like government, banks, primary dealers, FIs and the common citizens. CBS in RBI will enable anywhere banking (specially payments) to government departments, treasuries, sub-treasuries through online access and use of e-payment modes / delivery channels. In other words, it would facilitate government to use RTGS, NEFT, NECS and other electronic delivery channels for making all its payments through a single bank resulting in reconciliation being that much easier.  Banks and financial institutions will benefit from system of having a centralised account for funds and securities and an on-line transaction tracking mechanism linking funds and security legs. CBS is also intended to provide limited functionality of RTGS in case the RTGS services are not available for any reason.
Section 3. Game changers:

21. Having given a brief on the payment system landscape in India let me draw your attention to some of the trends which have within them the potential to drive our existing payment systems into the next orbit.
22. Entry of non-banks in payment systems: Payment systems in India till recently have been the domain of banks. With the legislation of Payment and Settlement System Act, 2007 (PSS Act) the arena has been opened up for entry of non-bank entities. Currently 31 non-bank entities have been permitted to operate payment systems such as issuance of pre-paid payment instruments, providing cross-border in-bound money transfer, cards payment network and ATM networks. The entry of non-bank entities has the potential to change the payment system landscape as these entities can leverage on their product offerings with latest technological features to cater to wide segment of the market. Of course the Reserve Bank has laid down appropriate guidelines and safeguards to protect the customers’ financial and other interest and promote orderly growth in the markets. Entry of non-bank entities will promote competition and thereby provide more choice to the customers.
23. Unique Identification authority of India- Aadhaar project- The unique identity number (Aadhaar) is poised to be an important driver of financial inclusion initiatives. Aadhaar which will provide a unique identification valid through the country when integrated with payment system application has the potential to shape the payment system future in the country.
24. Rapid improvements in the payment infrastructure: Last few years have seen expansion in the payment system infrastructure as a whole. There has been entry of new payment system operators, growing acceptance of new delivery channels, new products, increase in number of ATMs (80000+), PoS terminals (610156), augmentation and scaling of payment processing infrastructure etc. We have also witnessed the use of services provided by payment facilitators such as intermediaries, technology solution providers and merchant acquirers gaining ground in the industry.
25. Setting up of National Payment Corporation of India Ltd: NPCI has been set up as an umbrella organisation for retail payments with an objective of integrating and consolidating various clearing houses in the country for cheques and electronic payments and introduce new payment applications with focus on electronic payments. NPCI has already introduced RuPay, an indigenous domestic card scheme. It has also started operating Interbank Mobile Payment System (IMPS) which offers an instant 24X7, interbank electronic fund transfer service through mobile phones.

26. Domestic Card scheme- RuPay: The need for a domestic payment card the “RuPay” card is on account of two factors: (a) the high cost borne by the Indian banks for affiliation with international card associations in the absence of a domestic price setter and (b) the connection with international card associations resulting in the need for routing even domestic transactions, which account for more than 90% of the total, through a switch located outside the country. NPCI has since been granted approval to launch the "RuPay" affiliated cards for use at ATMs and Micro ATMs. NPCI has been advised to ensure that the use of these cards under the Aadhaar Enabled Payment System (AEPS) is in strict compliance with the DBOD guidelines on Business Correspondents (BCs). 4 banks have started using the RuPay card. These include: Kashi Gomati Gramin Bank; Bank of India DhanAdhar Card; The Gopinath Patil Parsik Janata Sahkari Bank Ltd; NKGSB Urban Co Op Bank Ltd.
27. RRBs in the payment system fold: The Report of the Working Group on technology up gradation of Regional Rural Banks, set up by RBI in 2008, recommended that as a matter of policy, all RRBs should begin moving towards CBS and achieve 100% coverage by September 2011. Currently, 45 out of 82 RRBs have achieved 100% CBS status, and the remaining are in various stages of implementation. You would agree that a CBS enabled RRB opens up immense possibilities in terms of products and services. As a first step, the sponsor banks would need to integrate the CBS of RRBs with their own Core Banking. This would enable the customers of RRBs to enjoy the same benefits of anywhere and anytime banking and the use of multiple payment delivery channels such as RTGS, NEFT, ECS, ATMs, internet, telebanking, mobile and SMS banking etc.
28. Payments as a revenue model getting attention: There is growing feeling that increased competition has commoditised the payment services undermining its profit generating ability. However, the McKinsey Global Payment Map, 2009 pegs that the payments services generate worldwide revenues of more than $900 billion each year (figure for 2007) which represent roughly 25 to 30 percent of total bank revenues.  Payments services thus not only provide a steady income stream for banks but also provide them daily opportunities to serve consumer thereby reinforce their brand. In India the recent spurt in cashless payment modes provide ample opportunity to payment system providers4. It is therefore necessary that banks view their investment in technology not as a cost but as a revenue making proposition enabling customers to access banking facilities especially various payment modes at their comfort without necessarily visiting a brick and mortar branch.
Section 4: Identifying the goldmine

Let me know dwell upon some of the untapped opportunities for banks.

29. Financial inclusion- Untapped market:  It would become very evident from the following figures that financial inclusion should be seen not only as a social responsibility but also as a potential business model because of the huge untapped market that it seeks to bring into the fold of banking services. In India almost halh the country is unbanked. Of the 6 lakh villages in India, the total number of villages with banking services stands at less than 1 lakh villages as at end March 2011. India has a highest number of households (approximately 145 million) who are excluded from banking. Thus this ‘bottom of the pyramid’ which comprises a huge section of the Indian population presents a large untapped market with a tremendous business potential. Therefore, the banks in India need to devise appropriate strategies for tapping the banking value that is represented by these large number of households at the bottom of the pyramid.
30. Government transactions- Transfer of benefit schemes: The largest chunk of government transactions with the citizens comprise revenue collection and transfer of benefits under various social programmes. McKinsey Report 2010 ‘Inclusive growth and financial security: The benefits of e-payments to Indian society’ estimates that an electronic platform for government payments to and from individual households could save an estimated Rs.100,000 crore a year – representing almost 10 percent of the total payment flows between the government and households. The report states that “delivering government payments electronically to the poor will not only pay for itself but will connect households to a formal and secure financial grid. The basic infrastructure and connectivity this provides will also create an attractive business proposition to encourage private players to enter this space and provide services to the poor”. The Reserve Bank has recently issued “Operational Guidelines on implementation of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) and its convergence with Financial Inclusion Plan (FIP)”. These guidelines are expected to give a fillip to financial inclusion efforts and lead to a scalable and sustainable financial inclusion model. In fact as you may be aware the Union Finance Ministry has advised all state owned banks and financial institutions to make payments only through electronic transfers and not through cheques from 1st September 2011. This move is part of the e-governance initiative to move towards a paperless funds transfer system. For the banks as well this would be economical proposition as it would reduce paper handling costs.
31. Potential triggers- Public transport, toll payments, tax payments etc.: There is tremendous scope for introducing stored value cards for public transport systems, toll taxes and local tax collections. The national highways alone constitute 40% of the total road traffic in India. The government had appointed a committee under the chairmanship of Shri. Nandan Nilekani, Chairman, UIDAI to examine all technologies available for Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) at the toll gates which has recommended use of RFID tags for electronic toll collection on national highways. Similarly the integrated urban transport projects being implemented in metros like Mumbai, Delhi, etc, have potential for stored value cards. The store value card could be used for both contact and contactless payments for low value payments and could be modelled upon Oyster card in London and the Octopus card in Hong Kong.

32. Tapping the value chain- Banks could identify the needs and requirements of customers, merchants, distributors, industry they are serving and create value proposition. With industry focusing on rural and semi-urban India, they would require a mechanism for channelizing the proceeds across vast geographical jurisdiction. Banks could tap this huge potential.
33. Let me quote an example here. We all know about Fabindia which is a major player in the Indian retail market. Fabindia started as a wholesale export company in 1960. It has 17 community-owned companies as its associate companies. “These companies have their own warehouses, contributing to the efficiency of Fabindia's supply chain. Their principal buyer is Fabindia, which positions itself as an ethnic-chic store for a variety of products, particularly garments. Fabindia focuses on retail, wholesale exports, and institutional sales to corporations, resorts and hotels. Fabindia had US$ 80 million in sales in 2007 and plans to establish growth to 250 stores over the next four years. Artisans Micro Finance Pvt Ltd owns 49% of Fabindia, while 20,000 artisan shareholders own 26%, with private investors and employees making up the final 25%. As a community-owned company, the value of the artisans’ shares increase as the company’s stock rises. Some artisans have doubled their share value, which they can use as collateral for loans”5. Thus the lack of an organised supply chain which usually results in extremely low price realisation for individual weavers and artisans, has been overcome in this case.
34. I would therefore urge the banking industry to look at such propositions for creating and tapping the value chain.  
35. E-commerce and m-commerce- Future ahead: As per the report on the E-commerce released by the Internet and mobile Association of India (IAMAI), the internet commerce industry in India is expected to INR 46,520 crores by end of 2011. The e-commerce and m-commerce are poised for a big stride in coming years. Banks and payment system operators could leverage on the huge potential of e-commerce and m-commerce.
Section 5: The enablers

36. Strategic Partnership- The evolving payment systems scenario offers new challenges and opportunities to all segments of this industry. The new evolving landscape especially in the retail payments area which I have highlighted above provide interesting challenges in harnessing the potential of technology amongst different stakeholders such as banks, system providers and other technology partners. These challenges encompass the search for new business models, which are now cost effective and wider in their scope and reach in terms of both geographical and customer coverage. Therefore the evolving payment ecosystem not only would encompass banks and the technology in use but would also have as critical stakeholders non-bank technology solution providers and system operators.
37. An example which readily comes into my mind is the need and relevance of crystallising such a strategic partnership amongst banks, mobile payments service providers and mobile network operators (MNOs). This is very much required as RBI as well as Government of India have consciously adopted a bank-led model for mobile payments as opposed to a MNO-led model for achieving the financial inclusion objectives. As you are all aware financial inclusion in India consists of four set objectives which include (i) Savings cum Overdraft Account; (ii) A Remittance Product for Electronic Benefit Transfer and other Remittances; (iii) A Pure Savings Product ideally a recurring or variable recurring deposit and (iv) Entrepreneurial Credit such as General Credit Card (GCC), Kisan Credit Card (KCC). Moreover with the banks providing these products under the financial inclusion umbrella, it is but necessary that they also ensure compliance with KYC/AML norms, create adequate risk management framework and ensure prompt settlement of funds. Given this comprehensive focus it is therefore necessary that MNOs actively collaborate with the banks to achieve objectives for financial inclusion. Therefore, this facet of a strategic and collaborative partnership framework needs to be recognised and given due impetus as it would provide the basic banking services to the ‘aam aadmi’.
38. Not only do I draw a reference to MNOs here, but I also refer to the role of payment aggregators and payment gateways. These entities are essential specialised technology providers who have come to occupy a niche area in the payment industry. Banks find it convenient to make use of the services of these entities to help them in their payment processing activities. While these entities play a significant role, it should be taken into account by the banking industry that proper service level agreements need to be put in place for minimising and mitigating risk including the safety of customer funds. I would draw your attention in this connection to the contents of the “Guidelines on Managing Risks and Code of Conduct in Outsourcing of Financial Services by banks” issued by Reserve Bank of India and the measures listed therein for managing and mitigating risks associated with outsourcing.  
39. One more area of strategic partnership is outsourcing of activities. Outsourcing is a reality that all of us have to live with. President Obama is fond of saying that jobs in USA have been ‘bangalored’ drawing an obvious reference to the fact that outsourcing provide cost savings and efficiency in operation leading the business entities to focus on their core activities. We are also witnessing a similar phenomenon in the banking sector with various activities especially technology related being outsourced to specialized entities. Whilst this arrangement has served the industry well, it must be recognised that outsourcing does not result in abdication of providing efficient services to the customer nor should it result in dilution of risk management practices and standards including the concentration risk of relying on few specialised entities.
40. Technology trends-The new technology trends such as cloud computing, mobile telephony and Service Oriented Architecture (SoA) etc, are likely to bring about significant changes in the way payments would be processed in the future.
41. The Mobile telephony is pervasive and ubiquitous with close to 850 million6 subscribers (as on June 30, 2011) and is expected to have 97% tele-density by 2015 (TRAI source). With high tele-density, introduction of smart phones, new technology such as 3G, innovative mobile payment solution providers mobile telephony is well poised to emerge as retail payment instrument of the future in terms of costs, convenience, speed and reach. The ASSOCHEM and Deloitte report ‘Mobile Payments in India New frontiers of growth’ April 2011 identifies the critical factors viz.  mass reach (across small distributors, traders and delivery agents), security, service provider agnostic, ease and convenience of operation, leverage on existing infrastructure and competitive pricing as critical factors for the success of mobile payments in India. The future of mobile payments in India will to a large extend depend on convergence of business models of banks, telecom operators and other stake holders.
42. Another technology which in conjunction with mobile phone is likely to drive the future payment mode is NFC. NFC, or near field communication, enables the exchange of data between devices in close proximity to each other. Use of NFC as a future payment technology is gaining attention worldwide with many technology providers notably among them Google are experimenting with this technology. NFC is quite successful in countries like Japan. In India there have been a few test runs with NFC payments but products are yet to be rolled out. Challenge with NFC is finding an ideal solution to host multiple cards in the same NFC handset. Further, use of NFC would require changes in payment processing, upgrading the PoS terminals at the merchant ends.
43. Liberalised business correspondent (BC) guidelines: BC guidelines have been significantly liberalised with corporates including MNOs having been allowed to come in as BCs. The banks are also now permitted to pay a reasonable commission/ fee to the BC. It is hoped that these liberalised guidelines would result in expansion of the banking coverage and along with technology provide a sustainable ecosystem for the unbanked and financially excluded segments of the population to be part of formal banking network.
44. Aadhaar Enabled Payment system: NPCI and UIDAI in partnership are ushering in the Aadhaar enabled payment system (AEPS).AEPS is a bank led model which allows online financial inclusion transaction at PoS (MicroATM using handheld device) through the business correspondent of a bank using the Aadhaar authentication. At present AEPS service can be availed by customers at their respective bank business correspondent outlets. AEPS will support four types of banking services viz. balance enquiry, cash withdrawal, cash deposit and Aadhaar to Aadhaar funds transfers. UIDAI along with NPCI has piloted Aadhaar enabled Payment System in Jharkhand. Basic transactions permissible over these accounts include cash deposit, cash withdrawal, balance enquiry, and inter-bank money transfer. This system also envisages the creation of an Aadhaar Enabled Payment Bridge which would facilitate direct disbursement of government benefits to the beneficiary by credit to their bank accounts using Aadhaar.
Section 6: Industry level challenges
45. Convergence of products and channels- Competition, technology, increased customer demand for comfort and convenience and regulatory initiatives have resulted in introduction of several payment products and channels over the time. However, banks have built these products and channels into separate silos and vertical. The CII-PWC survey ‘Payment Business in Indian Banks’ brought out this issue of separate silos and lack of interoperability among these silos. For instance, in some banks the Core Banking System is usually different from the card processing system.  The survey also highlights the issues that arise from disparate payment infrastructure for banks such as duplicity in work, lack of scalability, lack of STP, increase in the cost of payment processing. So the moot point is whether banks have fathomed the benefits of convergence in payment systems?
46. If analysed from a customer’s perspective, they maintain multiple payment instruments and multiple channels for different payment needs. Can we think of a regime where the all these payment instruments could be subsumed in a single instrument i.e. a single card acting as a debit card, credit card, pre-paid card and all purpose smart card? Can we think of convergence of channels- where mobile phones given their ubiquitous nature replace all payment channels and serve as portable device for all banking and financial service needs?
47. Technology issues: Banks are on a spree to introduce and upgrade technology to cater to the increasing customer base and needs. However, the issue the technology adoption and absorption in banks need a closure look whether it is holistic in nature or it is in disjointed and disarray mode. I have already drawn your reference to the need for payment system convergence in banks.

48. Another challenge for banks would be how to address the technology obsolescence through continuous technology upgradation. Apart from cost, upgradation poses significant challenges for banks in terms of replication across all technology assets and building awareness of end users and customers.

49. One more issue I want to highlight under the technology is preparedness of banks in terms of transaction processing to handle spurt in transactions on account of increased in customer base, product lines and increased usage of non-cash payments without compromising the safety and efficiency.  In my interactions with banks, I am told of fast approaching limitations in increasing the TPS (transaction per second) volumes. A few banks find it difficult to maintain the same level of efficiency and speed in all the payment channels on high volume and quarter ends.
50. Finally competition, changing customer preference for low cost payment alternatives, introduction of innovative payment instruments and payment channels and burgeoning transaction volumes and above all regulatory requirements are forcing banks to review their existing infrastructure and migrate to an enterprise payment processing system or payment hub that could integrate all payment instruments, interfaces with the core banking solution. However, migration to payment hub should be carried out in a well thought out manner so that the potential benefit in terms of efficiency, cost reduction, improved customer service and transparency in payment processing could be maximized.7
51. Safety and security in an ICT environment: Given the increasing use of ICT including the use of new delivery channels, safety and security of transactions has assumed paramount importance. All the new delivery channels and the various products which while providing convenience of banking services to the customers need necessarily have to incorporate sufficient security features to prevent fraud and misuse while at the same time ensuring ease and efficiency in operation. While the payment industry is alive to the challenge it must be kept in mind that fraudsters are always on the prowl for taking advantages of any chinks in the armour. Thus product design, implementation, availability and access to genuine customers should be seen in conjunction with maintaining high security standards on par with not only domestic but international standards as well.  This therefore prescribes the need for the industry to continuously engage in dialogue with security, IT, legal experts and relevant regulatory bodies and the government to take this process forward of ensuring safety and security of transactions.
52. In this context I would like to bring to your notice the report of the Working Group constituted by RBI under the Chairmanship of Shri. G. Gopalakrishna, ED, RBI on Information security, Electronic Banking, Technology Risk management and cyber frauds. The report provides detailed recommendations in areas relating to IT Governance, Information security, IT operations, Information system audit, Cyber frauds, Business Continuity Planning, customer education and legal issues arising out of the use of IT. I would urge the industry to pay special heed to these recommendations to continuously improve the safety and security of electronic banking transactions especially those that are payments related. I have been informed that a ‘High level group’ with representatives from banks, IBA, IDRBT and RBI has been set up to oversee the implementation of these recommendations.   
53. Coming to the safety and security measures related to specific payment products RBI is now looking at enhancing security of card present transactions. You would recall that the use of second factor authentication for all card not present transactions has since been made mandatory. This move has in fact encouraged the use of cards over the internet and has instilled confidence amongst the users that their transactions are being conducted in safe, secured and efficient manner.
54. You may also be aware that a working group constituted by the Reserve Bank has also come out with recommendations for securing card present transactions through the use of additional factor of authentication. The group has observed that the Aadhaar biometric data which is perhaps unique to India could very well serve as the secured additional factor of authentication, which would enable even the available magnetic stripe cards to be made more secured. Such a move would also obviate the necessity for switching over to an EMV chip and pin card regime which has obvious cost implications for the industry. The public consultation period having just been over the recommendations made in the report are being examined internally by the Reserve Bank of India.
55. Customer service issues: For any new payment instrument to flourish it is necessary that it provides the same degree of comfort and convenience in its repeated and regular usage with minimum fail rate.  Though banks should strive for a zero fail rate, it may not be feasible to eliminate failures fully. Such failures give rise to customer service issues. Appropriate processes have to be implemented for speedy resolution of such complaints within a reasonable time period. RBI has taken a number of initiatives in improving the resolution time period especially in case of failed ATM transactions. However, there are a number of grey areas which need to be resolved. I will highlight one such aspect relating to internet banking where dispute resolution mechanisms are yet to be fully developed. Complaints pertaining to un-reversed debits continue to be received.  It is difficult to identify and fix the responsibility in this regard.
56. Given the focus on customer service issues, it is perhaps necessary to look into the major recommendations of the Reserve Bank of India constituted Committee under the chairmanship of Shri M. Damodaran, former Chairman, Securities and Exchange Board of India, which looked at the banking services provided to retail and small customers, including pensioners. Some of the major recommendations towards improving customer service amongst others are: creation of a toll free common bank call number; providing small remittances at reasonable price; zero liability against loss in ATM and online transactions; prepaid instruments up to Rs. 50,000/- for frequent travelers; differential merchant discount /fee for debit cards; instant blocking of ATM card through SMS -BLOCK for lost / misused cards. The report has been placed on the RBI website for public consultation and I would urge the distinguished gathering here to provide their valuable feedback.
57. Financial inclusion- Tapping the value at the bottom of the pyramid: To quote the late Prof.C.K. Prahalad- ‘A significant opportunity for innovation in bottom of pyramid markets, centres around redefining the process to suit the infrastructure. Process innovation is a critical step in making products and services affordable for the poor. How to deliver it is as important as what to deliver.’8 In this context the efforts of the government, the Reserve Bank and the banking industry to provide banking services through financial inclusion have to be seen, appreciated and pushed forward with greater vigour. The challenge will be for the banks to integrate and reinvent their payment system infrastructure to cater to the customers at the extreme ends of the value chain especially at the bottom of the pyramid. I have already recounted some of the initiatives such as mobile banking, Aadhaar enabled payment systems, liberalisation of BC guidelines etc, which when deployed with a sound business plan can generate value not only to the customers but also to the banks. A simple example which readily comes to mind are the small ticket mobile prepaid coupons which are needed by customers at the bottom of the pyramid and are at the same time significant contributors to the revenues of mobile operators. So also is the case with single serve sachets of shampoo and toothpaste which are convenient and easy to use.
58. Developing an interoperable payment ecosystem: I will touch upon another dimension to distribution of payment services. Can we visualize a state of interoperability where a customer walks into any bank branch or post office for meeting his normal banking needs without necessarily visiting the bank/branch where he has an account? Whether the issue of availability could be addressed through inter-operability in the payment systems by building an ecosystem consisting of banks, post offices, BCs and may be non-bank participants in the system.
59. Benchmarking against global standards: It is perhaps appropriate that we benchmark ourselves against global standards as the world has become an integrated one with India becoming part of the global village. Cyber frauds are no longer restricted to onshore entities but could very well be triggered by offshore entities. In such a scenario it is extremely crucial that we benchmark our products, processes and designs with the globally available best practices and standards. Technology adoption and educating customers for appropriate use of technology is also part of this enabling process to usher in best practices and standards in the industry and the customer base that it serves. In this connection I may mention that RBI is member of the committee of payment and settlement systems, BIS, Basel which is the international standard setting body for payment and settlement systems. As part of this endeavour RBI is a member of steering group set up for framing the principles for financial market infrastructure (FMI). The principles for FMI’ report has just concluded its public consultation and it is likely that the final report will be issued early next year. The principles for FMI report has 24 recommendations devoted to the public policy objectives of safety, security of FMIs.
Section 7: Regulatory framework to serve as a catalyst
60. For the industry to prosper and for innovation to thrive a sound complementary regulatory framework is very much required. Such a framework should provide a level playing field for all providers to enable the customer to exercise his choices as regards choosing a particular service provider. Other important components for such a regulatory framework would also encompass customer protection issues, fraud prevention issues, security related issues and fair pricing. Having said this I draw your attention to the RBI’s vision document for payment systems for the period 2009-2012 wherein the framework for operation of all payment and settlement systems in the country has been clearly stated as being more than the usual 3Ss+E viz. safety, security, soundness and efficiency coupled with the 2As accessibility and authorisation.

61. Concomitant with this vision some of the regulatory measures taken by RBI include the creation and classification of the ATM network as a shared national payment infrastructure; mandating safety and security of transactions both paper based and electronic and card based payment systems; prescribing standards for cheques under cheque truncation; creating customer comfort through provision of positive confirmation, creation of customer facilitation centres, reducing the time taken for resolution of ATM failed transactions; telecommunication connectivity scheme for northeast region for expanding the reach of banking services; etc.

62. The regulatory framework also promoted innovation and orderly developments of new payment products such as prepaid card and mobile banking etc.  RBI has also undertaken selective intervention in pricing framework for various payment products to enhance their reach amongst the public.
Section 8: 5 A’s of payment system

63. Before I conclude, let me attempt to provide a link with my topic with the next session, which is on cost efficient business model for low cost banking.

64. In conclusion I would draw your attention to what I have generically termed as the 5 A’s of a payment system. These are availability, accessibility, acceptability, affordability and awareness of the system and the product.

65. Availability combines the notion of a level playing field for the service providers along with the availability of choice of products for the consumers.

66. Accessibility as a concept should be the cornerstone to expand the reach of the banking systems and the various payment products to all the sections of the society including the ‘aam aadmi’ as part of the financial inclusion plan and efforts.
67. Acceptability is the thought process which enables the customers to embrace the newer products and technology such that these become ubiquitous in nature just as mobile telephony has become in the country.

68. Affordability is a key corner stone which should guide the product offering as being value for money for the customers with technology and innovation being the important drivers for providing cost effective and quality services by the service providers.

69. Awareness- Creating awareness through financial literacy campaigns is necessary to increase the volumes in the payments business and to generate the necessary network effects for the successful operationalisation and implementation of newer technologically cost effective sound payment products. It is also necessary to simultaneously create awareness for inculcating security consciousness among the users of the various payment products to prevent instances of fraud and misuse. I would urge the IBA to take a lead in this regard and conduct payment system awareness campaign in tier II and tier III cities especially to spread this message. To supplement and to generate interest interactive software in the form of simulations and games could be part of this exercise.
70. Even if I look back over the last couple of decades, I would commend the progress made by the industry collectively in building a modern payment system in the country. The payment system today is vibrant, robust and technologically superior with multiple payment instruments, multiple access points and delivery channels to choose from. However, the benefit of modern payment system is yet to fully percolate to all segments of the society. As a result, a substantial portion of the population is still outside the realm of the formal and modern payment system.
71. Thus the stage is set for all of us especially the banks and the Indian Banks Association along with other stakeholders in the industry to collaborate with each other in a co-operative effort to expand the reach of banking sector and modern payment systems by making all efforts towards financial inclusion. In this endeavour, educating customers on the security comfort afforded by the payment products and the measures required to be taken by the customers for minimising fraud and misuse should also be an integral part.  Only then would we be able to realise productivity excellence in this sphere which has a direct bearing on sustainable growth of the economy and the percolation of the benefits of this growth to various sections of our citizenry.
Courtesy : RBI

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Cheque mate

Saikat Neogi
Posted online: 2011-02-15 23:38:28+05:30
Two months after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) introduced the new guidelines for the Cheque Truncation System (CTS) in the National Capital Region, some customers have had a nasty surprise: Many cheques started returning to issuers, due to alterations and over-writing in them.
The CTS is an online image-based cheque clearing system where cheque images and Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) data are captured at the collecting bank branch and transmitted electronically. In this process, the existing system of settlement of payment on the basis of physical cheque movement is eliminated.
The technology was introduced in the NCR and will be subsequently implemented in Chennai by the middle of the year and in other places like Mumbai. This will minimise the scope for frauds and provide benefits to both banks and the customers. As a result, any cheque which has over-writing or other corrections will be returned to the issuer of the cheque. However, changes or correction can be done on dates and for any other changes, one needs to issue a fresh cheque.
The cheque images captured at the presenting bank in the NCR are transmitted to the clearing house for onward transmission to the payee or drawee bank. It is the responsibility of the drawee bank to capture the inward data and images and generate the return file for unpaid instruments.
The electronic image of the cheque is sent to the drawee branch along with the image of the deposit slip which is clipped with the cheque by the customer. CTS reduces the scope for clearing-related frauds and minimises the cost of collection of cheque. For the bank, the benefits would be immense which would help them to introduce new products and optimise resources. Globally, CTS is being practised across many countries for faster clearing of cheques.
The RBI has given a directive to banks prohibiting alterations/corrections on cheques cleared under the image-based CTS. The central bank has also clarified that rule does not apply to cheques cleared under other clearing arrangements such as MICR clearing,non-MICR clearing, over-the-counter collection (for cash payment), or even for direct collection of cheques outside the Clearing House arrangement.
Diwakar Nigam, managing director of Newgen Software, the company which has developed the CTS software in NCR, says the system offers better reconciliation and will help prevent fraud. “It will also help a customer to get clearance within NCR in one day’s time and bring in efficiency in the process. It will also reduce the heavy paper-load as the process will be completely digitalised.” He says the second stage will cover Chennai and other southern regions and then to Mumbai. However, it will take three to five years to implement the process across the country.
Realisation of proceeds of cheques can be done the same day itself and not 3-4 days which is currently the case across the country. For inter-city cheques, it takes two days for the clearance. CTS is more secure and is protected by a comprehensive Public Key Infrastructure-based security architecture which incorporates basis security and authentication checks such as dual access control. It is more secure a system and does not create any delay or inconvenience to the customer in case the cheque is lost in transit.
Bankers say customers should use a dark-colour black ink pen while drawing the instruments and utmost care must be taken while using the rubber stamp and it should not be used on the printed code of the instruments. The physical cheque is warehoused with the presenting bank, in case the customer wants to get back the instrument.
Experts the central bank must conduct an awareness campaign on over-writing and other corrections on cheques. “People usually sign near the correction as that is what has been done for many years. But with CTS, a cheque which has an alteration, even with a signature beside the alteration the bank will not accept the cheque and instead return it to the customer,” says a banker.
Analysts say customers will have to be careful while issuing cheques for credit card payments, utility payments, insurance and investments, as most of them are linked to late payment fees. As a result of the central bank’s new directive, many utilities have been turning away cheques with any form of correction or alteration even if the changes were validated by the cheque drawer’s signature and that too in places either than the NCR. To avoid any late payment charges, they must pay well before time so that in case the cheque is returned, the customer will have enough time to issue a fresh cheque.
Courtesy: FE

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Review of Service Charges for Cheque Collection – Local, Outstation and Speed Clearing

RBI/2010-11/377
DPSS.CO.CHD.No. 1671 / 03.06.01 / 2010-11
January 19, 2011
The Chairman and Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer
All Scheduled Commercial Banks includin RRBs / UCBs /
State Co-operative Banks / District Central Co-operative Banks
Madam / Dear Sir,
Review of Service Charges for Cheque Collection – Local, Outstation and Speed Clearing
Given the advantages of using electronic modes for initiating payments, especially for large value transactions, Reserve Bank of India has been taking concerted steps towards increasing the acceptability, reach and efficiency of electronic transactions. Paper-based instruments, however, continue to account for a significant volume of payments in the country. Reserve Bank has therefore been encouraging the use of technology and the core-banking infrastructure of the banking system for reducing the clearing cycle and movement of cheques, both local and outstation.
2. In this regard, attention of banks is invited to our circulars DPSS.CO.No.611 / 03.01.03(P) / 2008-09 dated October 8, 2008 and DPSS.CO.No.829 / 03.01.03(SC) / 2008-09 dated November 17, 2008 in terms of which, charges for Outstation Cheque Collection as also cheques collected under the Speed Clearing arrangement were mandated by the Reserve Bank for different value bands.
3. On a review of the developments in this regard, it has been decided to revise the charges structure. While Reserve Bank would continue to mandate charges for smaller value transactions relating to savings account customers, greater freedom is being accorded to banks to determine charges for larger value transactions, subject to such charges being levied by the banks in a fair and transparent manner. These measures are expected to hasten the migration of transactions to electronic mode.
4. Accordingly, the following service charge structure will come into effect from April 1, 2011.
(a) Service (Processing) Charges for Local Clearing (by Clearing Houses from Member Banks) –
System
Existing (Rs.)
Revised (Rs.)
Presenting Bank
Drawee Bank
Presenting Bank
Drawee Bank
Clearing at MICR-CPCs
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.50
Cheque Truncation
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
(b) Service Charges for Outstation Cheque Collection –
Existing (Rs.)
Revised (Rs.)
Value
Service charge from all customers
Value
Service charge from Savings a/c customers
Up to and including 10,000
50
Up to and including 5,000
25^
Above 5,000 and up to and including 10,000
50*^
Above 10,000 and up to and including 1,00,000
100
Above 10,000 and up to and including 1,00,000
100*^
Above 1,00,000
150
Above 1,00,000
Left to the banks to decide
* No change.                                      
^ All inclusive maximum amount chargeable by banks to the customers.
(c)  Service Charges for Cheque Collection under Speed Clearing (by Collecting Banks from customers) –
Existing (Rs.)
Revised (Rs.)
Value
Service charge from all customers
Value
Service charge from Savings a/c customers
Up to and including   1,00,000
Nil
Up to and including 1,00,000
Nil*
Above 1,00,000
150
Above 1,00,000
Left to the banks to decide
* No change.
5. Banks are free to fix charges for collection of instruments for credit to other types of accounts.
6. While fixing service charges not mandated herein, banks may note the following –
(a) The service charge structure put in place by the bank should have the approval of the Board of Directors.
(b) Charges fixed should be reasonable and computed on a cost-plus-basis and not as an arbitrary percentage of the value of the instrument. The service charges-structure should not be open ended and should clearly specify the maximum charges that would be levied on customers including charges if any, payable to other banks.
(c) While sharing service charges, banks may be guided by the provisions of circular CIR / RB-I / CCP / 64 dated April 8, 2010 issued by the Indian Banks' Association.
(d) Banks may note to ensure that collection charges fixed for instruments of any value is lower under Speed Clearing vis-a-vis Outstation Cheque Collection so as to encourage the use of Speed Clearing.
(e) The service charges mandated / fixed by banks are inclusive of all charges (postal, courier, handling, etc.) other than service tax.
7. Banks shall use electronic modes like RTGS / NEFT to remit clearing proceeds to the collecting bank branch availing of Outstation Cheque Collection facility.
8. These directions are issued by the Reserve Bank of India in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 18 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 (Act 51 of 2007).
Yours faithfully,
(G Padmanabhan)
Chief General Manager

Monday, December 27, 2010

Housing Loans by Commercial Banks – LTV Ratio, Risk Weight and Provisioning

RBI No.2010-11/324
DBOD.No.BP.BC. 69 /08.12.001/2010-11
December 23, 2010
The Chairmen and Managing Directors/
Chief Executive Officers of
All Commercial Banks
(excluding Regional Rural Banks)
Dear Sir/Madam,
Housing Loans by Commercial Banks –
LTV Ratio, Risk Weight and Provisioning
Please refer to paragraphs 104 to 106 of the Second Quarter Review of Monetary Policy 2010-11 (extracts enclosed), proposing certain measures in regard to housing loans by commercial banks. Accordingly, banks are advised as under:
1. Loan to Value (LTV) Ratio
At present, there is no regulatory ceiling on the LTV ratio in respect of banks’ housing loan exposures. In order to prevent excessive leveraging, the LTV ratio in respect of housing loans hereafter should not exceed 80 per cent. However, for small value housing loans, i.e. housing loans up to Rs. 20 lakh (which get categorised as priority sector advances), it has been decided that the LTV ratio should not exceed 90 per cent.
2. Risk Weight
In terms of circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.83/21.06.001/2007-08 dated May 14, 2008 the risk weights on residential housing loans with LTV ratio up to 75 per cent are 50 per cent for loans up to Rs. 30 lakh and 75 per cent for loans above that amount. In case the LTV ratio is more than 75 per cent, the risk weight of all housing loans, irrespective of the amount of loan, is 100 per cent. Henceforth, the risk weight for residential housing loans of Rs. 75 lakh and above, irrespective of the LTV ratio, will be 125 per cent to prevent excessive speculation in the high value housing segment.
3. Provisioning
It has been observed that some banks are following the practice of sanctioning housing loans at teaser rates i.e. at comparatively lower rates of interest in the first few years, after which rates are reset at higher rates. This practice raises concern as some borrowers may find it difficult to service the loans once the normal interest rate, which is higher than the rate applicable in the initial years, becomes effective.  It has been also observed that many banks at the time of initial loan appraisal, do not take into account the repaying capacity of the borrower at normal lending rates. Therefore, in view of the higher risk associated with such loans, the standard asset provisioning on the outstanding amount has been increased from 0.40 per cent to 2.00 per cent with immediate effect. The provisioning on these assets would revert to 0.40 per cent after 1 year from the date on which the rates are reset at higher rates if the accounts remain ‘standard’.
Yours faithfully,
(B. Mahapatra)
Chief General Manager –in-Charge
Encls: As above

Housing Loans by Commercial Banks
Loan to Value Ratio in Housing Loans
104.   At present, there is no regulatory ceiling on the loan to value (LTV) ratio in respect of banks’ housing loan exposures. In order to prevent excessive leveraging, it is proposed:
  • that the LTV ratio in respect of housing loans hereafter should not exceed 80 per cent.
Risk Weights on Residential Housing Loans
105. At present, the risk weights on residential housing loans with LTV ratio up to 75 per cent are 50 per cent for loans up to Rs. 30 lakh and 75 per cent for loans above that amount. In case the LTV ratio is more than 75 per cent, the risk weight of all housing loans, irrespective of the amount of loan, is 100 per cent. Accordingly, it is proposed:
  • to increase the risk weight for residential housing loans of Rs. 75 lakh and above, irrespective of the LTV ratio, to 125 per cent.
Teaser Rates for Housing Loans
106. It has been observed that some banks are following the practice of sanctioning housing loans at ‘teaser rates’, wherein the loans are offered at a comparatively lower rate of interest in the first few years, after which rates are reset at higher rates. This practice raises concern as some borrowers may find it difficult to service the loans once the normal interest rate, which is higher than the rate applicable in the initial years, becomes effective. It has been observed that many banks at the time of initial loan appraisal do not take into account the repaying capacity of the borrower at normal lending rates. In view of the higher risk associated with such loans, it is proposed:
  • to increase the standard asset provisioning by commercial banks for all such loans to 2 per cent.

Remarks by Smt Shyamala Gopinath, DG, RBI at the inauguration of Inter-Bank Mobile Payment Service of the National Payment Corporation of India at Mumbai on November 22, 2010

1. Mr Hota, Mr Balachandran, my colleague Mr Padmanabhan, other executives of NPCI, fellow bankers, other dignitaries and my media friends present here. I am honoured to be here and I thank the NPCI for inviting me to inaugurate the Interbank Mobile Payment Services (IMPS), which has the potential to change the retail payment landscape in India provided all the stakeholders get it right.
2. The success of mobile penetration in India is now widely recognized. This huge success has encouraged it being increasingly leveraged to address other frontier issues of inclusive growth process. Exchange of money, one of the most fundamental economic functions in any economy, is one of such frontline issues. I can do no better than refer to the observations  from a recent book1 coauthored by  Mr. Sam Pitroda, one of the key architects of telecom revolution in India:  M-commerce is poised for a revolution, commencing in China and India.   It may initially focus on mobile banking and later, with integration of applications for consumer convenience, extend to other services.
3. Intuitively, the mobile phone, being more ubiquitous in nature offers a greater opportunity for effective delivery of financial services and furthering the cause of financial inclusion in a significant way.  With the evolution through Information & Communication Infrastructure, knowledge based initiatives, right to information and education, delivery of public services and employment and entrepreneurship mobile money has the potential to facilitate inclusive growth. .
4. Reserve Bank has acknowledged the importance of mobile banking channel as a critical element to achieving inclusive growth in India and has been taking several important steps, the recent being enabling the mobile companies to partner with banks as business correspondents. The twin challenge in our country would be to succeed in reducing the use of cash while encouraging the spread and use of mobile wallet to reap the full benefits of this ubiquitous product.
5. The three stakeholders viz. the telecom operators, banks and merchants have realized the value proposition and the only sustainable business model is where these stakeholders work together to deliver true value to customers and effectively share the costs saved and new revenues generated. Hence it is imperative that all the three while being cognizant of their strengths, do not lose sight of their weakness and find ways to integrate their offerings without losing their individuality.
6. As far as banks are concerned, the real challenge would be to reorient their business models to exploit the synergies provided by this model while addressing the key concerns.
  • Leveraging on  new technology
  • Extend the existing risk management practices to various delivery channels
  • Acquire all these transactions over the existing settlement networks
  • Aggregate various services as part of their existing cross-selling and co-branding initiatives
  • Fraud prevention and security standards; safeguards against money laundering, KYC issues
  • Ability to leverage their existing reporting, auditing, and campaign management at back end
Mobile Phones for financial services - across the globe
7. World over there has been increased use of mobile phones for extending financial services to the excluded populations.  Two models are mainly evident (i) bank led model and (ii) Non-bank led model.
8. The bank led model involves extending all banking facilities including money transfer facility to bank customers through the mobile channel. This pure bank led model essentially incorporates the whole gamut of financial services like acceptance of deposits, extending loans and also providing money transfer facility. The agents are employed by the banks and are therefore directly responsible for their activities.
9. The non-bank led model which are mainly provided by MSPs. A virtual electronic prepaid wallet on the mobile phone is provided to the customers. Customers can use the amount in the virtual account for remittance/payments for goods and services (M-Pesa, Kenya). The number of such models across the globe is very few. In this model the focus is on providing remittance facility. These models provide a virtual prepaid account held with  the MSP, which can be used by the customer for person-to-person remittance and payments.
10.  In India, it has been decided to adopt the bank-led model.
Mobile Payments in India :
11. The significance of this channel for the development of payment instruments and as payment channel has been recognized by the Reserve Bank. Accordingly the Reserve Bank of India issued the guidelines for Mobile Banking Transactions in October 2008.
12. The guidelines permit banks to provide mobile banking transactions and mandates that all transactions have to originate from one bank account and terminate in another bank account. The guidelines also permit banks to extend this facility through their business correspondents. The mobile banking guidelines were relaxed in December, 2009 to –
  1. enhance the daily cap  on both funds transfers and transactions involving purchase of goods and services to Rs.50,000
  2. Requirement of end-to-end encryption relaxed for transactions up to Rs.1000/- for small value transactions.
  3. Facilitate funds transfer from a bank account using a mobile phone with cash payout at ATMs/BCs up to Rs 5000.
13. Non-bank entities have been permitted, in August  2009, to issue semi closed prepaid m-wallets up to the value of Rs 5000/- with full KYC compliance based on the representation received from Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) The objective of keeping the limits low was to study the trend and progressively liberalize based on the experience. As on date a total of 6 non-bank entities have been authorized to issue prepaid mobile wallets. This includes one Mobile service provider. Another application is under process.
14. Given that India is still far from being a cash less society, the cash-in/cash-out arrangements in these models play an important part for scaling up. This can happen only if banks and mobile operators/card issuers work together as partners. It is gratifying to note that the high level of Inter-Ministerial Group anchored by the Department of Information Technology, Government of India that went into the issue, after extensive discussions, have reached more or less the same conclusion.GOI has consequently appointed various committees to address issues pertaining to provision of prioritized services for mobile banking transactions and pricing of such services.
15.  The recent relaxations contemplated in enabling mobile operators as BCs of banks should give a further fillip to these efforts.
16.  It has to be appreciated that in India, unlike in Kenya and Philippines, there are a number of    MSPs and a huge base of mobile subscribers. To have an efficient mobile based payment and remittance system would require inter-MSP payment services. This inter-operability is an important criterion for any payment product to be successful and acceptable. Facilitating this would require the setting up of a clearing and settlement arrangement for such non-bank operators. Such clearing and settlement arrangements could have systemic implications. This is where the facility being inaugurated today by the NPCI is filling an important pre requisite for the product to scale up.
17.  RBI has permitted 40 banks to do mobile banking and the customer base availing of mobile banking facilities as on September 30, 2010 stands at 8.87 lakh as compared to 6.16 lakh as at the end of August 2010. During September, 2010, 4.9 lakh transactions of value Rs. 44 crores were carried out  using this mode of payment both for transfer of funds and purchase of goods and services.
Concluding thoughts :
18. While the growth of mobile payments has been rapid, it is far from becoming an important source of financial inclusion. This in my view calls for two important facilitations. One, partnership rather than competition among the stake holders, importantly mobile companies and banks and two, a ubiquitous switch for enabling interbank p to p and p to b payments. While we are working towards achieving the first facility, NPCI has taken the important step of enabling the second important facility.
19. The Interbank Mobile Payment Services (IMPS) provides an inter-operable infrastructure to the banks for enabling interbank real time funds transfer transactions. What may be one of its strongest points, IMPS rides on the existing NFS Interbank ATM transaction switching infrastructure and message format – and hence easy for banks to adopt. It has the potential for the wide reach across the country when all NFS member banks adopt this service and promote this service aggressively.
20. Alongside this, with the recent relaxations in the BC guidelines, I believe that all the building blocks are in place. Now it is entirely up to the various stake holders to take the product forward.  More importantly, what has been facilitated by NPCI today can be construed as yet another step towards achieving its stated vision of becoming a true umbrella organisation for retail payments in this country. I hope NPCI will continue to show equal enthusiasm in commissioning and completing other important projects like the cheque truncation and the much awaited India Card.
21. I too join Mr Balachandran in congratulating the IBA, entire NPCI team and all others who have contributed to the roll out of this product. I wish the NPCI success in all their endeavors.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Levy of Cash Handling Charges by Banks

Normally banks do not charge from their customer for depositing money to their own account. However, some banks levy charges for cash payment against credit card bills. Charges are collected at the time of accepting cash. As per the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines banks need to inform about changes in rates or charges to their customer one month before implementation. RBI vide its circular dated September 7, 1999 had given freedom to banks to decide service charges for various services offered to customers. Banks were asked to fix service charges having regard to the cost of rendering the services. Banks were also advised to ensure that the charges are reasonable and not out of line with the average cost of providing these services. Banks should also take care to ensure that customers with low volume of activities are not penalized.
According to RBI, the currency chest holding banks have been allowed to levy service charge of Rs. 2 per packet of 100 pieces in cash deposited with their currency chest by non-currency chest branches. Banks have also been advised to put in place a transparent policy in this regard with the approval of their respective boards.
This information was given by the Minister of State for Finance, Shri Namo Narain Meena in written reply to a question raised in Rajya Sabha.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Electronic Funds Transfer Infrastructure in India – Usage of RTGS and NEFT

RBI/2010-11/259
DPSS (CO) RTGS No.1008/04.04.002/2010-2011

November 03, 2010
Chairman and Managing Director /
Chief Executive Officer of all banks participating in RTGS and NEFT
Madam / Dear Sir,
Electronic Funds Transfer Infrastructure in India – Usage of RTGS and NEFT
Please refer to our earlier circulars DPSS (CO) RTGS No. 729/04.04.002/2006 – 2007 dated December 1, 2006 (introducing the threshold value limit for customer transactions in RTGS to Rs 1 lakh) and DPSS (CO) No. 611 / 03.01.03 (P) / 2008 – 09 dated October 8, 2008 (levy of service charges for electronic payment products).
2. The Indian RTGS system has displayed tremendous growth in both transactions volume and the values that it has been processing since its inception in March, 2004. With the increasing number of electronic payment transactions, it has become expedient to position the Indian RTGS system primarily for processing and settling large value payment orders. Further, RBI has set up a robust retail electronic funds transfer system in the form of National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) system, with near real-time settlement finality with 11 settlement cycles in a day.
3. It has, therefore, been decided in consultation with system participants to increase the threshold value limit for RTGS transactions from the present limit of ` 1 lakh to ` 2 lakhs. As an incentive to customers to move their transactions to NEFT, a new value band in the ` 1 lakh to ` 2 lakh segment has been created, with customers having to pay lower charges vis-à-vis RTGS transactions. The details of the existing service charges and the revised service charges are given below :
System
Value Band
Customer Charges
RTGS
Existing
Revised
` 1 lakh to ` 2 lakhs
` 25
-
above ` 2 lakhs to ` 5 lakhs
` 25
` 25
above ` 5 lakhs
` 50
` 50
NEFT up to ` 1 lakh
` 5
` 5
above ` 1 lakh to ` 2 lakhs
` 25
`15
above ` 2 lakhs
` 25
` 25
4. The service charges in the value band ` 1 lakh to ` 2 lakhs at ` 15/- per transaction in NEFT, effectively provides a saving of ` 10/- per transaction to the customer. Thus, the special niche value band created in NEFT, is a value proposition for customers providing funds transfer in a timely manner with wider geographical coverage at a lesser cost. This measure would also significantly contribute to further improving the efficiency of the RTGS system.
5. The revised threshold limits for customer transactions in RTGS system and revised NEFT service charges will be implemented with effect from November 15, 2010.
6. All member banks are advised to encourage customers to take advantage of this facility.
Please acknowledge receipt.
Yours faithfully,
(G. Padmanabhan)
Chief General Manager

Friday, October 29, 2010

Opening of bank accounts - salaried employees

RBI/ 2010-11/245
DBOD. AML. BC. No. 50/14.01.001/2010-11

October 26, 2010

The Chairmen/CEOs of all Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs) /
All India Financial Institutions

Dear Sir,

Opening of bank accounts - salaried employees

Please refer to our Master Circular on Know Your Customer (KYC) norms /Anti-Money Laundering (AML) standards/Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT)/Obligation of banks under PMLA, 2002 issued to banks vide DBOD.AML.BC.No.2/14.01.001/2010 – 11 dated July 01, 2010. In Annex I to the circular an indicative list of the nature and type of documents/ information that may be relied upon for customer identification and address verification for opening bank accounts has been given.

2. It has been brought to our notice that for opening bank accounts of salaried employees some banks rely on a certificate/letter issued by the employer as the only KYC document for the purposes of certification of identity as well as address proof. Such a practice is open to misuse and fraught with risk. It is, therefore, clarified that with a view to containing the risk of fraud banks need to rely on such certification only from corporates and other entities of repute and should be aware of the competent authority designated by the concerned employer to issue such certificate/letter. Further, in addition to the certificate from employer, banks should insist on at least one of the officially valid documents as provided in the Prevention of Money Laundering Rules (viz. passport, driving licence, PAN Card, Voter’s Identity card etc.) or utility bills for KYC purposes for opening bank account of salaried employees of corporates and other entities.

3. These guidelines are issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Rule 7 of Prevention of Money-Laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries) Rules, 2005. Any contravention thereof or non-compliance shall attract penalties under Banking Regulation Act.

Yours faithfully,

(Vinay Baijal)
Chief General Manager

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Uniformity in penal interest payable by banks for delays in credit / return of NEFT / NECS / ECS transactions

RBI/2010-11/188
DPSS (CO) EPPD No.  477/ 04.03.01 / 2010-11
September 1, 2010
The Chairman and Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer
of member banks participating in / NEFT / NECS / ECS
Madam / Dear Sir,
Uniformity in penal interest payable by banks for delays in
credit / return of NEFT / NECS / ECS transactions
As you are aware, the recent past has been witness to significant growth in retail electronic payment products - both in terms of reach and volume. NEFT is offered by close to 70,000 bank branches in the country and ECS is available at 89 centres. More than 9 million transactions in NEFT and 25 million transactions in NECS / ECS were processed during the month of July 2010 alone. While this augurs well for the migration of payment transactions to the electronic mode, it is imperative that customer service and efficiency parameters are effectively dealt with as well by the member banks.
In terms of the NEFT / NECS / ECS Procedural Guidelines as also the relevant circulars / instructions issued by us from time to time, member banks need to afford credits to beneficiary accounts or return transactions (uncredited for whatever reason) to the originating / sponsor bank within the prescribed timeline. Any delays in doing so attract penal provisions specified therein.
The penal provisions are not uniform across these retail electronic payment systems. While banks have to pay penal interest @ prevailing Bank Rate + two per cent in NECS (Paragraph 15.4 of Procedural Guidelines) and ECS-Credit (Paragraph 29 of Procedural Guidelines), the relevant provision is Bank Rate in NEFT (Paragraph 6.7 of Procedural Guidelines). In order to ensure standardisation of the benchmark rate used and bring in uniformity in penal provisions across the retail payment products, the following modifications are being made:
NECS / ECS-Credit
“........Destination Bank would be held liable to pay penal interest at the current RBI LAF Repo Rate plus two per cent from the due date of credit till the date of actual credit for any delayed credit to the beneficiaries’ account. Penal interest shall be credited to the Beneficiary's Account even if no claim is lodged.”
NEFT
Paragraph 6.7 - “In the event of any delay or loss on account of error, negligence or fraud on the part of an employee of the destination bank in the completion of funds transfer pursuant to receipt of payment instruction by the destination bank leading to delayed payment to the beneficiary, the destination bank shall pay compensation at current RBI LAF Repo Rate plus two per cent for the period of delay. In the event of delay in return of the funds transfer instruction for any reason whatsoever, the destination bank shall refund the amount together with interest at the current RBI LAF Repo Rate plus two per cent till the date of refund."
Paragraph 6.8 is also being substituted as under –
"During the NEFT operating hours, originating banks should endeavour to put through the requests for NEFT transactions received by them, either online or across the counters, preferably in the next available batch but, in any case, not exceeding two hours from the time of receipt of the requests. In the likelihood of any delay / possible delay in adhering to this requirement, the originators / customers should be informed of the delay / possible delay and the reasons for the same."
Member banks may take note of the above changes in the Procedural Guidelines. These changes are applicable with immediate effect.
Yours faithfully
(G. Padmanabhan)
Chief General Manager