India Innovation Pioneers Challenge 2009-Dr. Sudipta Saha, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology

Department of Science and Technology (DST), Indo-US Science and Technology Forum (IUSSTF) and Intel have partnered on building technology entrepreneurship programs in India. The objectives of the program are to create an entrepreneurial ecosystem in India, boost entrepreneurial spirit in Indian academia and scientific enterprises through business plan competitions, and to build a curriculum on technology entrepreneurship for Indian academia.

India Innovation Pioneers Challenge 2009 is an innovative technology business plan competition that provides an unparalleled avenue of opportunities for emerging entrepreneurs to explore and share ideas and gain insight for commercializing their venture through the mentoring and networking support that are integral to the competition.

India Innovation Pioneers Challenge 2009 has taken the definition of a "Business Plan Competition" to a level higher than ever before as it offers an unlimited opportunity for aspiring entrepreneurs to plan for commercialization of their venture.

It provides young innovators with:

A platform to showcase technology

Smart commercialization strategies

Guidance from experts and mentors

Excellent funding opportunities

Global business opportunities

International experience of a lifetime

Winners of Scholar Sparks 2009

The winners of India Innovation Pioneers Challenge 2009 were announced by Mr. Prithviraj Chavan, Hon’ble Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Science and Technology & Earth Sciences, Govt. of India, at a ceremony held at Taj Palace Hotel, New Delhi on the 28th of August 2009 in the presence of Dr. T. Ramasami, Secretary Department of Science and Technology, Government of India and Dr. Praveen Vishakantaiah, President, Intel Technology, India.

The top three teams under Scholar Sparks category received cash award of Rs Three lakhs (First prize), Rs. One lakh (Second prize) and Rs. Fifty thousand (Third prize) respectively. Besides this, two teams recognized as “Honorable Mentions” from the jury received a cash award of Rs. Twenty five thousand each
Also the top two teams from the Scholar Sparks category will be representing India at the Intel-University of California, Berkeley Technology Entrepreneurship Challenge 2009.

Awardees Details:

First Prize:Rs 3 lakhs cash award
Also an opportunity to participate at the Intel-University of California, Berkeley
Technology Entrepreneurship Challenge 2009
Team Name: Intraosseous Device
Team Members & Institute:Jayant Sitaram Karve & Srinivas Kiran Jaggu; Stanford
India Biodesign Centre, (AIIMS) New Delhi

Business Plan Description:
IntraOz is a novel medical device start up which aims to provide an alternative to difficult intravenous (IV) access in medical emergencies. This technology comprises of applying progressive vacuum at needle tip as it progresses inside the marrow and gives visual indication. Fluids and medications infused via IO lines reach the central circulation in equivalent speed of intravenous infusion. The market potential for IntraOz will be an estimated 1.3 million patients (including pediatrics & adults) annually.

Second Prize:Rs. 1 lakh cash award
Also an opportunity to participate at the Intel-University of California Berkeley
Technology Entrepreneurship Challenge 2009
Team Name: µSpore
Team Members & Institute:Prabhakar Kulkarni, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune

Business Plan Description:
µSpore is a novel patented technology for long term storage and transportation of DNA samples using microcapsules isolated from spores and pollen grains, which are in the form of micronic or sub-micronic capsules. The application areas for the technology cover forensic science, health care, pharmaceuticals, medicine, military and basic research. The technology is cheaper, eco-friendly & easy-to-handle and will be accessible and affordable to users even from economically underprivileged nations.

Third Prize: Rs. Fifty Thousand cash award
Team Name: Indigenous Dental Implants
Team Members & Institute: Dr. Manjeet Mapara & S.M. Abdul Khader; Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Institute of Technology

Business Plan Description:
Indigenous Dental Implants is a project that attempts to make a new biotechnology accessible to the general Indian population and also to enhance the surgical skills of Indian dentists in the field of Implantology. The technology involves a special laser treated bioactive surface for the dental implant which is superior & cheaper compared to all the contemporary implants in the market. The product aims at attracting a huge market comprising of upper middle class & middle class population in India with the cost advantage.

Honorable Mentions:
Team Name: Innovation Challenger Kolkata
Team Members & Institute:Dr. Sudipta Saha, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology,
Prize:Rs. 25000 cash award

Business Plan Description:
This project deals with a unique computer-based spectrophotometric system to determine "vertical velocity" of the spermatozoa. It has been developed using the turbidimetric method of sperm motility analysis. This technology will be extremely helpful for treatment of human infertility and planning of animal breeding programmes. The potential market will comprise of various human infertility clinics, sperm banks, animal breeding centers, research laboratories and centers for conservation of endangered species, etc

Team Name: The Mavericks
Team Members & Institute:Nakul Khanna & Abhinav Bansal, G.D. Goenka Public School, Delhi
Prize:Rs. 25000 cash award

Business Plan Description:
This team has developed a Massaging Shoe. The idea is to provide solutions for people suffering from daily stress by incorporating massaging devices in their shoes. These devices are small enough to fit into an ordinary shoe and are powered by rechargeable batteries so that they can be used on the go and doesn’t require one to carry around bulky massaging devices. Along with its massaging effect it also has a therapeutic effect; hence it will be a boon to those suffering from lifestyle disease such as diabetic feet, etc.

E-governance drive gets a babu beating

Ashish Sinha

New Delhi, July 27, 2009

An ambitious government plan to revolutionise the trundling pen-pushing procedures of the Indian bureaucracy, by aligning it with an e-enabled computerfriendly regime, is facing opposition from within. The "Central Secretariat Manual of e-Office Procedure", the first draft of which was circulated recently by the department of administrative reforms and public grievances (DARPG), is aimed at bringing higher efficiency, transparency and accountability among government officials. However, computer- unfriendly Indian officials wary of e-enabled changes in the working environment are opposing the move citing concerns over privacy, legality and lack of computer training. The existing manual on office procedure lays down in great detail how a central government office should function, right from the point at which a file is created till a decision is taken at the highest echelons of the government. Now, in line with the government"s thrust on e-governance, the DARPG"s new "electronic" version of the draft manual incorporates changes in the system so that a "modern office environment" can be created. Steps have been taken to improve the core spirit of the previous manual by "incorporating procedures to support electronic environment and introducing transformational opportunities after due deliberation," reads the objective of the draft, prepared by National Institute of Smart Government (NISG), Hyderabad, and PricewaterhouseCoopers. The draft makes far- reaching proposals. It suggests that chatting on the Net between on an issue can be a time-saving way of arriving at a decision and should be recognised as a means of "official communication". It also says that an exchange of SMSes between officers after sending a file from one office to another over the electronic system should be recognised as a way of acknowledging that the communication has been duly dispatched and received. But the seemingly radical move"though similar steps are already a commonplace in Indian businesses"involves computer literacy. The bureaucracy"s well-known resistance to change and "fear" of the digital world are key factors that are acting as roadblocks in the way of introducing the e-enabled system. Privately, senior government officials are candid about their reasons for resisting the new move. "I am not ready to look at a computer screen from 9 am to 5 pm every day. There are the issues of eyesight and legality. How do you sign a file? How do you incorporate changes? At present, several drafts are made and discarded. I do not understand how you can do that on a computer," said a senior bureaucrat speaking on the condition of anonymity. A joint secretary in the government said, "I have gone through it (the "Central Secretariat Manual of e-Office Procedure"). It reads like a dream manual. Even if partially adopted, it will not only save time but bring about accountability, efficiency and transparency. But, to suddenly change the way we have been working is a huge challenge." Another official said "the most difficult part" for the bureaucracy, which is comfortable with the paper filing system, is to learn computer and Internet usage. Aware that officials would oppose the draft manual of e-office procedure, the government has said it will do what it takes to support the changeover to e-governance. It is ready, for instance, to provide as many computers as an office needs. Under the rules, government departments are expected to spend 5 per cent of their budget on information technology, including the purchase of computers and allied systems. The e-manual draft document takes pains to address other concerns raised by the bureaucrats from the "old school". It says how a file should be created and moved. The originating department should send the file in a digital format to another department. The receiving office should then create a "shadow e-file" at its end and this document would then be moved to different sections and officers for their opinions. Before the document is sent back to the originating department, only the final result of this process would be recorded on the e-file by the officer concerned. Assigning an e-number to the file so that it becomes an instantly retrievable record is the task of the "Dak" section. "The department will open subject-wise e-files each year in which such routine notes will be kept. The inter-departmental note recorded on the e-file of the originating department will bear the subject e-file number to facilitate storage and retrieval for future reference," says the document. Since government departments already have a huge volume of existing physical records, the manual proposes that when a department switches over to the e-office system, the existing physical files will have to be scanned and digitised. It proposes that while all current/live files may be scanned and digitised, semi-current/nonlive files can be preserved only on a need basis. "All closed physical files which contain decisions of longer lasting value from the angle of running the department may also be scanned/ digitised. All important treaties/agreements etc may also be scanned digitised," it says. Some of this language may be obscure for government officials and could make the move to the new modern system more difficult than it appears. To begin with, government officials are under no obligation to dump the existing filing system. Some government departments, however, had adopted egovernance earlier. These are departments that have a direct interface with the public--like issuing various types of licences, collecting taxes, issuing passports, public grievance registries, those responsible for land record management and ticketing systems. Yet, age-old habits of officials in most departments have acted to discourage the shift to an e-enabled environment. "I know some secretary-level officers whose personal assistants place printouts of emails on their tables every morning. To make the manual successful, it has to be made mandatory in a time-bound manner. Computers must not be used as stylish typewriters," said a senior officer posted at Planning Commission. Courtesy: Mail Today